(no subject)
Sep. 22nd, 2005 06:35 pmMy mother is sitting here and telling me that the name of the Lolita fashion came from a book in the 1950's where a man begins to lust after his young stepdaughter.
Would anyone here like to explain to her the origin of the name and how it doesn't do with this? Or does it? She's making it out to be like many people do; some sort of fetish. I know there is an actual fetish for young women, but is the fashion of EGL named after that? The name Lolita itself means a sexually pretenious young girl. Yet 'Lola' derives from sorrowful.
I guess I'm basically asking if the fashion Lolita is named after this novel.
Would anyone here like to explain to her the origin of the name and how it doesn't do with this? Or does it? She's making it out to be like many people do; some sort of fetish. I know there is an actual fetish for young women, but is the fashion of EGL named after that? The name Lolita itself means a sexually pretenious young girl. Yet 'Lola' derives from sorrowful.
I guess I'm basically asking if the fashion Lolita is named after this novel.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:41 pm (UTC)The book (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0679723161/qid=1127428796/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-1637845-1596163?v=glance&s=books&n=507846) is very good, and I recommend it, though it may not be for everyone.
So your mother is sort of right.
But I think the Japanese use it to mean a kind of child-adult, with the innocence of a child but the mind of an adult; much different than the Western view of the lascivious youngster. Neither and both are the same as the Lo in the book.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:46 pm (UTC)my take on this...
Lolita by vladmir portrays a young girl loving an older man...=> japanese go... lolita must be the young girl!.... lolita is a young girl! the fashion lolita is chosen to express a young girl's appearance... lolita= the fashion statement.
Hence following the lolita lifestyle to me... wouldn't exist... since the lifestyle could be labelled under many other things... i think the peter pan thingo?
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:47 pm (UTC)(Rest of lolis out there: If I'm off the mark, please correct me!)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 11:12 pm (UTC)I'd appriciate any tidbit of info.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 11:19 pm (UTC)Here's an article about EGL which may help your mother understand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elegant_gothic_lolita
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 11:27 pm (UTC)LOLITA comes from spanish ok? ^^
And it means little girl ^^... and it is not a pervert word or something like that. I say fo my friends "lolita" and is very normal and accepted... ok?o.o....
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 11:46 pm (UTC)Lolita in Japan has NO sexual undertones. In fact, it it clearly mean to be unsexy. (Unless you are talking about Ero-Lolita, which is in fact a subculture beneath a subculture)
Lolitas take pride in being very precisely groomed and immaculately mannered/behaved. Our intent is more of a doll-like image - to capture it's innocence. Lolita in America, unfortunately, is a term that used to be harmless, but due to this novel, has ended up becoming a twisted slang term.
Don't worry too much - we are asked about this all the time. It's okay.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 11:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 12:00 am (UTC)I mean, come on, there is a Japanese subculture that derives from Nazi uniforms for Christ's sake. They don't understand how that could be taken offensively. They just think it's cool and fashionable.
Your mother needs to understand that things literally do get LOST IN TRANSLATION.
The Japanese do not understand the negative connotations of the word "lolita."
In fact, calling the style "Gothic and Lolita" is just supposed to make the style seem "cooler" in the Japanese scheme of things because it's a name derived from Western terms and this style is Western influenced.
So no, "gothic and lolita" was NOT taken from the book Lolita. And no, the title "Lolita" is not the first instance / creation of the word and its only meaning. Lolita originally meant young (like comments above already acknowledged). Then, because of the book mainly (and probably other things), it got negative connotions (kind of like the word gay). The Japanese have ignored or just NOT NOTICED this second step and are using lolita as a flowery term for "young." It just sounds better to them.
Obviously, the gothic and lolitas of Japan are not dressing up to attract horny, perverted men. That's a duh. They just think they're style is beautiful and unique (among other things). But there are perverts for everything these days. People that get turned on by feet. People that get turned on by milk. Even people that get turned on by shitting out barbie doll heads (Wonder of the World anyone??). Okay, this is getting off topic.
The point is that EVERYTHING can be perversed nowdays but that is not a focus of the Japanese subculture gothic and lolita (and well, milk, and barbies, and feet). I mean obviously, you should have already known that, but now you can logically argue it with your mother (who's assumptive ignorance surprises me).
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 12:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 07:06 am (UTC)That's so not how I read 'Lolita', but everyone has their own take on the novel :)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 04:11 am (UTC)::points to icon:: Lolita from the latest edition of the movie.
In short-
Lolita, the name, was forever changed by the book. If you say "Lolita" chances are good, the person you're talking to will respond with, "Pervert!" when the book was, in fact, art for arts sake. Nabokov's goal was to write a book, using English, which is not his native language, and to do it from the point of the pedophile. Many people who read the book fall for it! They sympathize with who should rightly be a villain and think that Lolita deserved what she gets, which she doesn't, because damnit, she's like 12 years old!
I might point out that if you're looking for something raunchy, Lolita is not it. There's lots and lots and lots and looooooots and lots of sex (and one memorable masturbation scene) but it's all described in very flowery language. Nabokov was good at that.
So, fast forward. Lolita has now come to mean, through the twisting that all Americans are good at, a girl who is young but acts older, especially in regards to her sexuality. With young being the keyword here.
Gothic Lolita does indeed originate from the book, and anyone who tells you otherwise is in denial, probably because they never read the book and are only reacting to the horrible reputation the book has. (It's a well written book!) Gothic we already know. Lolita refers to how the style is very childish in appearance. At the same time...I think the style is pretty sexy as well. In a childish way. And of course, the Japanese are all about the "Lolita Complex."
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 04:32 am (UTC)And yeah, as other people have mentioned. Gothic Lolita and Lolita in general is fetished, I've seen lots of hentai and porn with it, but from what I saw in Japan it is, on the streets, JUST a clothing style.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 05:57 am (UTC)Also, as cuntella said, ANYTHING can be fetishised. If you wore a burlap sack all the time, someone, somewhere will find it sexy and probably would make porn of it.
PS: Sorry if I sound a bit English-class-ish. Just wanted to give examples.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 07:11 am (UTC)THAT'S how I read Lolita. It is a testament to Nabokov's writing that even today, people sympathise with the villain of the piece, and condemn the victim (Lolita) in their heads. Even her name ('Sorrowful') is a clue; the novel is wonderfully richly layered with meaning. In effect, Nabokov wrote a novel about a paedophile from the paedophile's point of view. And he makes you take the paedophile's side all the way through the novel. Lolita is exploited and used, yet still we use her name to describe adolescent sensuality.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 02:25 pm (UTC)1) the fashion (which has NOTHING to do with the fetish because supposedly men hate girls who dress in lolita fashion, they think it's weird)
2) Young girl, in a sexual way. Think of girls with sailor uniforms and loose socks. In Japan, men like girls like that. They pay money to have sex with them. It's called lolicon (rorikon) which means lolita complex, which is they have a fetish for young girls.
Hope that helps.
In the gothic and lolita Bible, lolita fashion is spelt as rori-ta. (ロリータ)But on the internet, lolita fashion is spelt as roriita instead, (ロリイタ)as compared to the fetish which is referred to as rori-ta (ロリータ) on the internet. It's confusing but you'll get used to it. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 02:27 pm (UTC)I guess the answer to your question is 'yes' and 'no' at the same time. In a way, it was, but with regards to the fashion it really doesn't have that kind of a meaning to it at all.